Showing posts with label Power relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Power relations. Show all posts

Sunday, April 26, 2015

House of Cards, Season 1, Episode 9 (15:20-17:40)

Title: House of Cards, Season 1, Episode 9 (15:20-17:40)
Tags: power, media, Freedman, control, relationships
Author: Julie G
Date: March 23, 2015


Summary: 
House of Cards is an intriguing and captivating political drama focused on the power wielded by a fictional U.S. Congressman, Frank Underwood. Frank Underwood is the epitome of an old-school realist politician; he believes in power for power’s sake and aims to always be the one pulling the strings and moving the actors around on stage. By the ninth episode of the first season, Frank has built up a significant relationship with Zoe, a young journalist protégée, who has thus far played the game according to Frank’s rules. However, in this video clip, Zoe tries to limit Frank’s power over her by ending their sexual affair. Upon hearing this, Frank, who is always used to having full control over all the actors in his life, is less than pleased, despite his reassuring words to her. At the end of the clip, he cynically says, “She wants to be an adult; let’s see how she can fly once she leaves the nest.”

Analysis:
This brief clip provides an excellent opportunity to examine Des Freedman’s view of the power of the media as presented in his text The Contradictions of Media Power. As a high-ranking politician, Frank is used to having the media at his constant beck-and-call. As Freedman states, the media holds no great power by itself, but instead services power for others, allowing certain voices and agendas to be disseminated through their pen. “Media power, according to this view, is like a junior partner in a coalition dominated by more established social forces like religion, armies, politicians or corporations” (Freedman 8). Frank’s attitude and actions reflect his agreement with Freedman; the media is a lesser power that should operate only by the rules he, the politician and the superior, sets. When Frank realizes that Zoe intends to overstep this power hierarchy by ending the physical part of their relationship, he is entirely displeased. Despite his words to her, Frank decides to punish her by “letting her see how she can fly.” Thus, in the rest of the episode, he gives her the cold shoulder, not giving her any new information. As Frank later says, “sex is about power,” and without direct power over Zoe, he risks losing control over her. Without immediate control, there would be the possibility that Zoe would no longer service his political needs in her journalistic endeavors. Thus, she would become an unreliable and useless source for promoting his political agenda. Throughout the rest of the episode, he ignores her in order to reestablish the power hierarchy, in the end forcing her to sleep with him to gain new information. Although his plan is risky, he successfully manipulates Zoe back to her earlier state of “junior partner.” As Freedman explains, media power is fundamentally based on relationships cultivated by the media themselves (30). By ending a part of her relationship with Frank, Zoe unknowingly sabotages her power over and access to Frank. Additionally, Freedman talks about how access to the media is fundamentally unequal throughout society (30). In relation to House of Cards, Frank is one of the privileged few who does not suffer from access to media institutions. In fact, Frank would argue that the media suffers from inadequate access to him, and those lucky journalists that do gain access must service his agenda in order to get their story.

Orange is the New Black, Season 2, Episode 11 (minute 43:40- 44:50)


Title: Orange is the New Black, Season 2, Episode 11 (minute 43:40-44:50)
Tags: Freedom of expression, Neoliberalism, Power relations, Dimensions of power, Over and covert power, Subjective interests, Decision making
Authors: Maria Cely, Lauren Sherman, Jessica Bonnett
Date: March 23rd, 2015




This clip, located in season two, episode eleven of Orange is the New Black, illustrates Luke’s three dimensions of power and is briefly associated with Chomsky’s illusions to neoliberalism. The scene takes place in an episode where the prisoners are practicing what they believe to be their “right” to free speech through creating and distributing a newsletter and participating in a hunger strike.
In this extract it is possible to observe how one-dimensional power takes place with the decision making of the character Figueroa. She is the decision maker of the prison and decides to take away the freedom of speech within the prison by suppressing the newsletter that was being published and not allowing the inmates to make hunger strike posters. Figueroa states her decision very clearly and loudly, making it an overt decision on an overt subject, which is ultimately for a subjective reason. The reason behind the banning of freedom of speech is to maintain the prison’s reputation, but ultimately the reputation of her and her husband. Nevertheless, Figueroa justifies her actions by whispering to Caputo that she is a defender of women.
Luke’s two-dimensional power is manifest in two ways by the prisoners. One is the hunger strike practiced by the nun, Soso, and the yoga teacher. Their decision not to eat represents an attempt to display that they still have control over their own bodies. They mainly participate in the hunger strike to bring awareness to key issues that satisfy their subjective interests and well-being. Soso is doing it to maintain her values after she was forced to take a shower, while the yoga teacher is rebelling against Shoe being used as a punishment and the nun is doing it in response to her old friend being thrown out on the street to die. In addition to the hunger strike, Piper has started a prison newsletter that serves as a source of covert power of the prisoners who post their own articles and cartoons, making fun of those who have power over them as a sort of an inside joke.

            The third power dimension is represented throughout this scene when observing the prisoners’ actions and reactions. They set an agenda of what they want to see and what they want to be changed in the prison through a newsletter. This agenda setting is prompted by their assumption of still being in a neoliberal atmosphere, where they have freedoms of speech and expression, but they soon realize that these articulations of neoliberal policies are no longer recognized in prison. Their freedoms have been stripped from them, including rights over their own bodies. This latent conflict shows that the prisoners’ backgrounds and cultures have led them to believe that they have these rights and freedoms, while Figueroa quickly shows them that they do not within the prison walls. The interest of freedom of speech is real, and the prisoners are fighting for this objective interest to fulfill their own subjective interests afterwards.