Monday, May 11, 2015

Game of Thrones, Season 2, Episode 4

Title: Game of Thrones, Season 2, Episode 4
Tags: Capital, Power, Cultural Capital, Social Capital, Cult, Bourdieu
Authors: Tamara Grasty and Lara Olgiati
Date: March 23, 2015


Game of Thrones is a television series that is fragmented into various regions of an imaginary world with many opposing rulers. In our analysis, we will focus on a particular region, Dragonstone in which Melisandre, the Red Priestess, and Stannis Baratheon, brother of the late king Robert Baratheon, live. She has recently converted Stannis to a new religion which worships the Lord of Light under the motto: “The night is dark and full of terrors.” Melisandre, the enigmatic Red Priestess appears in the second season as a charismatic religious leader. The audience is given little of her personal background and for much of the second season questions her proclaimed magical abilities. Melisandre was the child of a slave but was chosen by the Lord of Light to become the Red Priestess. In her waxing power she chooses her own followers and promotes them to positions of power which showcase her control of their political hierarchy.
In our episode of focus “Garden of Bones” Stannis and Melisandre try to convince Renly, Stannis’ brother, that he should relinquish his army and control and in reward he will have a position on Stannis’ council. Renly refuses, and Melisandre tells him to “Look to your sins Lord Renly, for the night is dark and full of terrors.” She returns to the sea gates that and gives birth to a shadow child which assassinates him.
Using Bourdieu’s theory of “Forms of Capital” we dissect the types of  capital Melisandre utilizes in her political ascendance. Her cultural capital is easily divided into the subsections of embodied state, objectified state and institutionalized state. Although we know little of her upbring we may presume that she has invested a significant amount of time and energy in learning about her new religion and in becoming a legitimate leader of this new cult. She has the ability to perform blood rituals, foresee the future, give birth to shadow children and is immune to poison. She uses tools, objectified state, such as her fire cauldron which she can use to perform blood magic to see into the future. She is also always appropriately attired to signify to her constituents that she is a legitimate figure in her developing cult. Because her cult is newly established her institutionalized state is in its infancy and therefore has none of the official certificates which Bourdieu cites as an essential legitimization of this subset of cultural capital. She was educated by the Lord of Light himself and is the primary teacher for her new disciples. Her political power is the result of her symbolic power although none of this is directly translatable into economic capital. In fact, their lack of economic capital is a source of their political weakness. Stannis does not have a proper army at his disposal  and at the same time Dragonstone does not have enough money to sustain the expansion of this army. Melisandre, by giving birth to the shadow child, is able to provide Stannis with the destructive force he requires to assassinate his rival Renly Baratheon.
Melisandre increases her social capital which is defined as “actual and potential network of institutionalized relations” (Bourdieu). She has created a cult of which she is the center and is in the process of legitimizing her power through religious intolerance similar to the Spanish Inquisition.  She originates her own practices, places and occasions said to be the markers of a legitimate institution. The Red Priestess’s social capital is best summarized in Bourdieu’s concept of the personality cult: “Everything combines to cause the signifier to take the place of the signified, the spokesmen that of the group he is supposed to express, not least because his distinction, his ‘outstandingness,’ his visibility constitute the essential part, if not the essence, of this power, which, being entirely set within the logic of knowledge and acknowledgment, is fundamentally a symbolic power; but also because the representative, the sign, the emblem, may be, and create, the whole reality of groups which receive effective social existence only in and through representation” (Bourdieu).

Bourdieu’s notion that all forms of capital are reducible to economic capital does not apply well to this character analysis because although Melisandre is powerful, her skills are not economically comparable and so she and her constituents remain relatively poor in that sense.

Course Offering


A very interesting part of this class was that we have learned various forms of power, and the way it is used to support and create social dynamics. By reflecting on power manifestations in relation to TV drama we learned to connect power systems to personal experiences. We critically reflected on the media content we were exposed to, which additionally helped us determine the ways different forms of power are used. In my TV show Drama for example, the majority of power was used in many different ways. We also learned to observe and build upon the power of our inner self through meditations, and reflecting on these new skills by taking walks outside. By reading literature concerning power vocabularies and how to acknowledge such, we established more critical and in-depth thought processes that helped us acknowledge the power dynamics inside our hometown. This enabled us to better relate to personal experiences of power. 

The Good Wife, Season 6 Episode 17

Title: The Good Wife, Season 6 Episode 17 (minute 28.20)
Tags: rhetoric, storytelling, narrative, political scandal, Aristotle
Author: S. Webber
Date: May 11th, 2015



CBS’s primetime show The Good Wife follows fictional character Alicia Florrick as she moves through personal, political, and legal challenges as a successful lawyer at a top law firm and as the wife of a politically scandalized politician, who now sits as Governor of Chicago. This episode directly addresses the use of political and private rhetoric just as Alicia has been elected State’s Attorney and struggles to appease powerful forces around her, and to withstand an oncoming scandal. In addition to referring to the general language and manner demanded of politics, the discussion presented here highlights the extensive importance of rhetoric at all junctions. Eli, Alicia’s political manager with whom she engages in this clip, represents Aristotle’s general perspective regarding rhetoric- that which purely exists to trick or unduly persuade the listener. However, Eli provides much needed insight, drawing directly from Herrick’s discussion of rhetoric by telling Alicia that the language that she uses, defined by its delivery (and therein timing), works to create the framework used to organize individuals’ thoughts- making them either her enemy or ally. Furthermore, the interruption of this discussion by personal quarries in the background provides extra emphasis upon the high human value held by language and it’s application. Similarly, the program often presents this value in a professional context by showing court scenes and planning sessions, in which the lawyers seek to portray a select narrative in order to persuade the jury or judge through convincing storytelling, just as Del Gandio outlines in his text Rhetoric For Radicals. Ultimately, The Good Wife serves as an excellent example of the power of rhetoric, and in this particular episode it is deeply accentuated by the drama unfolding throughout the different scenes that define Alicia’s life.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

House Of Cards Season 1, Episode 2; Season 1, Episode 13; Season 2, Episode 13

Title: House of Cards Season 1, Episode 2; Season 1, Episode 13; Season 2, Episode 13
Tags: power, capital, Bourdieu, Power Elite, Mills
Authors: Jordan Ricker and Holly Stokes
Date: March 23, 2015


2nd video clip: Season 1, Episode 13, minute 16 to 16:25
3rd video clip: Season 2, Episode 13, minute 30:20 to 31:20

Summary: This is a selection of three clips that illustrate Frank and Remy's contrasting views on the most important thing to strive after - money or power. It is a series of exchanges between the two ranging from the second episode of the first season, "Chapter 2" until the end of the second season in "Chapter 26." While Remy used to work for Frank, he has now moved up in influence, largely because of his financial accumulations. This past relationship, plus their differing views on whether money or power is more important, plays a large role in House of Cards. These three excerpts are some of the best-distilled quotes that summarize the different approaches.

Analysis: 
What is the most meaningful form of capital?
In Pierre’s Bourdieu's 1986 The Forms of Capital, he argues that the three forms of capital are economic, social, and cultural with economic being the end goal and most meaningful. In House of Cards, Frank’s personal beliefs contradict those of Bourdieu because Frank argues that true power is not possible to gain from purely economic capital. He believes that power is a stable structure built through networking and social capital. It is not flashy, it is not financially based, it is a social and political power that is fortified through connections and traditions. This is very well expressed when he says, “Money is the Mc-mansion in Sarasota that starts falling apart after 10 years. Power is the old stone building that stands for centuries” (4:48). Frank’s view of power is extremely human-focused, wherein he contradicts Bourdieu and argues that politicians and “old money” are the most important players of the political elite described by C. Wright Mills. 
Remy, on the other hand, argues with Bourdieu’s view that economic capital is the strongest form of capital. Remy believes that money rules all and that the temporary and quick building of economic capital does not diminish its power – in fact, it augments it because it does not take as much time to accumulate. In his view, money is actually more long lasting than Frank’s view of “power” because alliances can change and whither over time but money will not. Economic influence does not need to be continuously cultivated. Remy believes the “corporate elite” are the most powerful of the Power Elite theory espoused by Mills. While both of these central characters in House of Cards seem to be focusing on the best way to influence other people – that is, to get what they want from others, they each believe that their respective way of going about it is the best. Reader, what do you think is the most meaningful form of capital? Who possesses it and who is able to possess it? And lastly, is capital the determining aspect of power relations in the world today?

Saturday, May 9, 2015

House of Cards, Season 1, Episode 1

Title: House of Cards, Season 1, Episode 1
Tags: media power, Freedman, contradiction, control, influence, arrangement
Author: Kirsten Murphy
Date: March 23rd, 2015

Episode Summary: In this opening episode of the popular Netflix series House of Cards, viewers get an introduction into all that the series has come to stand for  - political maneuvering, power plays, bargaining using influence and power, and the personal motivations of society’s power elite. In this episode we are introduced to many of the main characters in the first season of the series – Frank and Claire Underwood, Peter Russo, Doug Stamper, Zoe Barnes, and the like. The clip that I have choosen shows the initial meeting between Zoe and Frank; a meeting that Zoe initiated by showing up at Frank’s personal residence.



Analysis: In the first chapter of his book The Contradictions of Media Power Des Freedman discusses how contradiction is one of the four major paradigms in media power. Freedman explains that media power is an interested force, but one that is tied to existing reproductions of power through relationships. This clip is a good example of this because Zoe (who represents media power) must offer many concessions to Frank (who represents existing reproductions of power, or government) in order to gain influence. Although media is formally separated from the state, it is still intertwined with it – as can be seen later on when Zoe and Frank heighten their arrangement to one that is also sexual.

Furthermore, as Freedman explains in his book, power is the “relationship between different interests engaged in struggles for a range of objectives that include legitimation, influence, control, status, and increasingly, profit.” In this clip there is a struggle for all of these things between Zoe and Frank. Zoe wants the legitimation, status, and profit that having information from an influential senator like Frank can give her. Frank wants to have influence and control over the media, by controlling Zoe and what she prints. In this balance of power Frank has the advantage so Zoe must offer concessions like printing whatever she is told to, and not asking any questions. This further illustrates how media power must work within government stipulations, or existing reproductions of power in other words. Examples of this in the real world can be seen in government censorship, and controlled media releases from government officials.


Ultimately, as Freedman explains, media power is only as strong as readers and viewers allow it to be. Yet it is also only as strong as existing power structures, like the government, allows it to be. This can be seen through Frank and Zoe’s arrangement that originates in this clip. Later on in the series, Zoe (media power) will try to become stronger and more independent, but Frank (government) will still have a level of influence and control that dominates over Zoe’s media power.